Consumer is the hardest place in venture to raise right now, and pretending otherwise wastes your time. Roughly half of all venture capital in 2025 went to AI, and consumer competes for what is left against sectors with clearer revenue. The firms still writing consumer cheques are specific about what they want: organic growth they can verify, retention that does not depend on paid acquisition, and economics that work at the second purchase rather than the first.
Reviewed Full-year 2025
These are market-wide figures rather than consumer totals, and that is deliberate: no major publisher reports a clean annual consumer figure, and inventing one would be worse than framing the environment honestly. The environment is what matters here anyway. Total funding rose 30% to $425bn while roughly half went to AI and five companies took $84bn of it. Consumer is raising against that backdrop, which is why the surviving consumer investors have become so specific about evidence.
A fund tagged "consumer" sits in one of four columns, and they have less in common than in any other sector. A brand fund and a consumer software fund are not variations of one another: one underwrites inventory and margin, the other underwrites retention curves.
| Consumer software & social | Brands & CPG | Marketplaces | Creator & community | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Typical entry stage | Pre-seed to seed | Seed, once there is repeat purchase | Seed to Series A | Pre-seed to seed |
| Cheque shape | Ordinary venture | Equity plus inventory financing | Ordinary venture | Smaller venture, sometimes revenue-based |
| Wants to see | Organic growth and daily or weekly retention | Repeat purchase rate and contribution margin | Liquidity in one geography or category first | An audience that transfers to a product |
| Time to revenue | 12-24 months, often later than growth | Immediate, though margin takes longer | 12-18 months | Immediate but small |
| Biggest risk they underwrite | Retention decaying once novelty passes | Paid acquisition costs rising faster than margin | Disintermediation once buyers and sellers meet | Dependence on one platform’s algorithm |
| Who else must be in the round | Angels with distribution | An operator who has scaled a brand | Nobody in particular | A strategic with audience reach |
Consumer investors we hold in the Causo catalogue, grouped by the cheque they actually write. Open any of them to see the partners, the stage and the recent deals. This is not every consumer investor in the market, and no catalogue is.
Firms whose entire mandate is consumer, several focused specifically on brands.
Firms writing the first cheque into consumer products and brands.
Firms that lead once repeat purchase and contribution margin are established.
Platform and media balance sheets, plus firms whose consumer activity sits outside the US.
The gates that are specific to this sector, and that a generalist fundraising guide will not tell you about.
One worked example of what reading those sources produces, from the Causo catalogue with the identity removed.
A seed fund whose record is concentrated in consumer brands rather than consumer software, with a stated focus on health, wellness and household categories. Entry is at seed once there is repeat purchase, and the portfolio shows a preference for founders who have operated in retail.
Consumer specialists include Goodwater Capital, Consumer Ventures, Selva Ventures, Brand Foundry Ventures, The Chernin Group and Able Partners. At seed, NextView Ventures, Upfront Ventures, Sugar Capital and Kitchen Fund are active. Slow Ventures and Collab Fund lead later consumer rounds. Prosus Ventures and Legend Capital are among the larger non-US investors.
Yes, and the reason is competition for capital rather than anything about consumer itself. Roughly half of all venture funding in 2025 went to AI-related companies, up from 34% in 2024, and five AI companies alone took $84bn, a fifth of everything deployed. Consumer raises against what remains.
For brands, repeat purchase rate, time between orders and contribution margin after cost of goods, shipping, returns and discounts. For consumer software, week-four and week-twelve retention and the share of growth that is organic. In both cases the second purchase or the fourth week matters far more than the first.
Consumer software, sometimes, where usage and retention can substitute for revenue. Brands, rarely, because the whole question is whether people buy again and that cannot be answered before anyone has bought once. Most brand funds want repeat-purchase evidence before a seed cheque.
There is no universal number and any figure quoted as one is wrong. What consistently matters is shape rather than size: growth that is not bought, retention that flattens rather than decaying to zero, and margin that improves with volume. A smaller business with those properties raises more easily than a larger one without them.
Look at the last eighteen months of announced deals. Consumer is the sector where stated theses have drifted furthest from behaviour, and several firms that still describe themselves as consumer investors have quietly moved towards AI or B2B. Recent deals, new fund closes and what partners write about are the reliable signals.