Fintech is the sector where the label hides the most. A payments infrastructure company sells software and raises equity. A lender sells a balance sheet and needs debt its equity investors will not provide. An insurtech needs a carrier partner before it needs a Series A. Knowing which of those you are, and which investors do that specific thing, matters more here than in any other sector.
Reviewed Full-year 2025
Dollars up 27% and deals down 23% in the same year means one thing: fewer companies raised, and the ones that did raised much more. The concentration is visible in the individual rounds, with Polymarket and Binance at $2bn each, Kalshi at $1bn, Kraken at $800m and Ramp raising twice. Strip out the very largest cheques and the picture for an ordinary seed-stage fintech is closer to the falling deal count than to the rising headline.
This is the table worth keeping. A fund tagged "fintech" sits in one of four columns, and the columns want different companies with different capital structures. The lending column is the one founders most often misread, because equity is only half of what that business needs.
| Payments & infrastructure | Lending & credit | Banking & neobanks | Insurtech & wealth | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Typical entry stage | Pre-seed to Series A | Seed, once there is loan performance | Seed to Series A | Seed to Series A |
| Cheque shape | Ordinary venture | Equity plus a separate debt facility | Venture, with regulatory capital planned | Ordinary venture |
| Wants to see | Transaction volume and take rate | Cohort loss curves and cost of capital | Deposit growth and cost per funded account | A carrier or custodian partner already signed |
| Time to revenue | 6-12 months | Immediate, though profitability lags | 12-24 months | 12-18 months |
| Biggest risk they underwrite | Margin compression as processors compete | Credit losses in a downturn | Regulatory change and the cost of compliance | Distribution, and a partner that can walk away |
| Who else must be in the round | Nobody in particular | A debt provider, arranged before you need it | A sponsor bank or licensed partner | A strategic with a book of customers |
Fintech investors we hold in the Causo catalogue, grouped by the cheque they actually write. Open any of them to see the partners, the stage and the recent deals. This is not every fintech investor in the market, and no catalogue is.
Firms whose entire mandate is financial services and the infrastructure beneath it.
Firms that write the first institutional cheque, several of them focused on emerging markets.
Firms that lead once there is volume, loan performance or deposit growth to underwrite.
Balance-sheet investors whose parent is a bank, insurer, network or data provider.
The gates that are specific to this sector, and that a generalist fundraising guide will not tell you about.
One worked example of what reading those sources produces, from the Causo catalogue with the identity removed.
A high-volume personal angel practice running past 150 investments, with a typical ticket around $100,000 and stated capacity up to $1m. The record is explicit that this is not a thesis-driven fund: the money is personal, the interests span consumer brands and social products as well as the financial infrastructure underneath modern companies, including payroll, banking and payments.
Fintech-dedicated firms include Better Tomorrow Ventures, Nyca Partners, Ribbit Capital, Fin Capital, Core Innovation Capital, Clocktower Technology Ventures and Commerce Ventures. In emerging markets Quona Capital, Flourish Ventures and Ingressive Capital are active. Corporate arms including Capital One Ventures and MassMutual Ventures invest strategically. Which of them is relevant depends far more on whether you are payments, lending, banking or insurance than on geography.
Global fintech companies raised $51.8bn in 2025, up 27% on the $40.8bn raised in 2024, across 3,457 deals. That deal count was down 23% year on year, so the sector grew in dollars while shrinking in the number of companies funded. It remains far below the $141.6bn peak of 2021.
In dollars yes, in deal count no. The 27% rise in 2025 was driven by a small number of very large rounds, including $2bn each for Polymarket and Binance, $1bn for Kalshi and $800m for Kraken. For a company raising an ordinary seed round, the falling deal count is the more relevant number.
Almost never from the same vehicle. Venture equity funds the company; a separate warehouse or credit facility funds the loan book. Some fintech specialists will introduce debt providers and a few affiliated platforms offer both, but a founder who expects an equity round to fund lending has misunderstood the structure, and investors read that quickly.
For payments, transaction volume and a defensible take rate. For lending, early cohort loss curves and a realistic cost of capital. For banking, cost per funded account and deposit behaviour. For insurtech, a carrier or custodian partner already signed. Across all four, a precise account of your regulatory position and who holds the licence.
Usually not, but you need a credible plan. Most early fintech companies operate as an agent of a licensed partner or with a sponsor bank while an application progresses. What matters to an investor is that you know which route you are taking, what it costs, how long it takes and what happens to the business if the application is refused.